Leaked snippets?

[WeezyFan]

Re: Leaked snippets?

& that makes me think that I fuckin' want the full version.

The soup snippet is more dope than the version where its verse was featured on
Btw, I listen to the snippet now for the first time. & There is a "verse" before that longer soup snippet which was featured on the Ontraji? song.
Which song is it?

''I own it'' I think, but I edited it into the snippet: Multiupload.com - upload your files to multiple file hosting sites!

[bushido95]

Re: Leaked snippets?

''I own it'' I think, but I edited it into the snippet: Multiupload.com - upload your files to multiple file hosting sites!

No I mean this:
There are two Soup snippets. The one snippet was whole featured on I Own It. The other, which I listened the first time to, has some other lines before. Wayne raps: You're looking like Nicole, Richie call me Biggie/ or something like that
That's the second/third line off that snippet I never heard before. The other snippet says : Cause I'm hungry as a mo'fucker.
Now which song is it where he raps that line with Nicole?
Sounds kinda like a ICFMF leftover, cause if you listen to Blow/ the leftovers, there is song after song after song & its bad cut.

[WeezyFan]

Re: Leaked snippets?

No I mean this:
There are two Soup snippets. The one snippet was whole featured on I Own It. The other, which I listened the first time to, has some other lines before. Wayne raps: You're looking like Nicole, Richie call me Biggie/ or something like that
That's the second/third line off that snippet I never heard before. The other snippet says : Cause I'm hungry as a mo'fucker.
Now which song is it where he raps that line with Nicole?
Sounds kinda like a ICFMF leftover, cause if you listen to Blow/ the leftovers, there is song after song after song & its bad cut.

all I know is that on Soup/Dinnertime Wayne is rapping on 3 different beats in 1 song.

[bushido95]

Re: Leaked snippets?

all I know is that on Soup/Dinnertime Wayne is rapping on 3 different beats in 1 song.

That's what I wanted to read/hear.

[Jewazi]

Re: Leaked snippets?

heres a couple


Hulkshare.com Get Ready (Snippet).mp3
Hulkshare.com Rock N Roll [Snippet].mp3
Hulkshare.com Soup Snippet.mp3
Hulkshare.com You And I (Snippet).mp3
Hulkshare.com Put_The_Light_On_Me.mp3

Lmk if you got them other snippets from other years

[danielnfl36]

Re: Leaked snippets?

Lmk if you got them other snippets from other years

both the unknown snippets sound fucking amazing!

[Jewazi]

Re: Leaked snippets?

both the unknown snippets sound fucking amazing!

tbh closed after 3 seconds, cant even hear what hes saying

[danielnfl36]

Re: Leaked snippets?

tbh closed after 3 seconds, cant even hear what hes saying

watchu mean bro

[Jewazi]

Re: Leaked snippets?

watchu mean bro

Well what i was trying to get at was business decision-making, sunk costs are retrospective (past) that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk costs are sometimes contrasted with prospective costs, which are future costs that may be incurred or changed if an action is taken. Both retrospective and prospective costs may be either fixed (that is, they are not dependent on the volume of economic activity, however measured) or variable (dependent on volume).In traditional microeconomic theory, only prospective (future) costs are relevant to an investment decision. Traditional economics proposes that an economic actor not let sunk costs influence one's decisions, because doing so would not be rationally assessing a decision exclusively on its own merits. The decision-maker may make rational decisions according to their own incentives; these incentives may dictate different decisions than would be dictated by efficiency or profitability, and this is considered an incentive problem and distinct from a sunk cost problem.Evidence from suggests this theory fails to predict real-world behavior. Sunk costs greatly affect actors' decisions, because many humans are and thus normally act irrationally when making economic decisions.Sunk costs should not affect the rational decision-maker's best choice. However, until a decision-maker irreversibly commits resources, the prospective cost is an and is properly included in any decision-making processes. For example, if one is considering movie tickets, but has not actually purchased them yet, the cost remains avoidable. If the price of the tickets rises to an amount that requires him to pay more than the value he places on them, he should figure the change in prospective cost into the decision-making and re-evaluate his decision.

Don't take it personal or anything bro.

[Caesar]

Re: Leaked snippets?

Well what i was trying to get at was business decision-making, sunk costs are retrospective (past) that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk costs are sometimes contrasted with prospective costs, which are future costs that may be incurred or changed if an action is taken. Both retrospective and prospective costs may be either fixed (that is, they are not dependent on the volume of economic activity, however measured) or variable (dependent on volume).In traditional microeconomic theory, only prospective (future) costs are relevant to an investment decision. Traditional economics proposes that an economic actor not let sunk costs influence one's decisions, because doing so would not be rationally assessing a decision exclusively on its own merits. The decision-maker may make rational decisions according to their own incentives; these incentives may dictate different decisions than would be dictated by efficiency or profitability, and this is considered an incentive problem and distinct from a sunk cost problem.Evidence from suggests this theory fails to predict real-world behavior. Sunk costs greatly affect actors' decisions, because many humans are and thus normally act irrationally when making economic decisions.Sunk costs should not affect the rational decision-maker's best choice. However, until a decision-maker irreversibly commits resources, the prospective cost is an and is properly included in any decision-making processes. For example, if one is considering movie tickets, but has not actually purchased them yet, the cost remains avoidable. If the price of the tickets rises to an amount that requires him to pay more than the value he places on them, he should figure the change in prospective cost into the decision-making and re-evaluate his decision.

Don't take it personal or anything bro.

[danielnfl36]

Re: Leaked snippets?

Well what i was trying to get at was business decision-making, sunk costs are retrospective (past) that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk costs are sometimes contrasted with prospective costs, which are future costs that may be incurred or changed if an action is taken. Both retrospective and prospective costs may be either fixed (that is, they are not dependent on the volume of economic activity, however measured) or variable (dependent on volume).In traditional microeconomic theory, only prospective (future) costs are relevant to an investment decision. Traditional economics proposes that an economic actor not let sunk costs influence one's decisions, because doing so would not be rationally assessing a decision exclusively on its own merits. The decision-maker may make rational decisions according to their own incentives; these incentives may dictate different decisions than would be dictated by efficiency or profitability, and this is considered an incentive problem and distinct from a sunk cost problem.Evidence from suggests this theory fails to predict real-world behavior. Sunk costs greatly affect actors' decisions, because many humans are and thus normally act irrationally when making economic decisions.Sunk costs should not affect the rational decision-maker's best choice. However, until a decision-maker irreversibly commits resources, the prospective cost is an and is properly included in any decision-making processes. For example, if one is considering movie tickets, but has not actually purchased them yet, the cost remains avoidable. If the price of the tickets rises to an amount that requires him to pay more than the value he places on them, he should figure the change in prospective cost into the decision-making and re-evaluate his decision.

Don't take it personal or anything bro.

wtf did u just say 0.0 i have no clue

[@liltunechi17]

Re: Leaked snippets?

Lmk if you got them other snippets from other years

heres 4 other ones that are older

Hulkshare.com 26) Lil Wayne See It For Yourself.mp3
Hulkshare.com Lil' Wayne- Flip (Snippet).mp3 (Mixed With New Beat Possibly?)
Hulkshare.com Lil Wayne-See It For Myself.mp3
Hulkshare.com Blinded.mp3