Weezy The Coder

[TrendKill21]

Re: Weezy The Coder

Thank you bliss, I was trippin for a minute. I was a bit skeptical by the use of 4 different ways of decoding being used simultaneously though.


for shits and giggles whats does trendkill21 mean?

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

Re: Weezy The Coder

Thank you bliss, I was trippin for a minute. I was a bit skeptical by the use of 4 different ways of decoding being used simultaneously though.


for shits and giggles whats does trendkill21 mean?

No problem, I didn't pay attention when I first read this thread but seeing as it had 10 pages of posts I thought I should and then I realised it wasn't being done in just one way so I looked up pi code to see about it so I could try help clear it up for people.

But yeah HomeMaker decrypt: Michael Bliss and TrendKill21

[Guest]

Re: Weezy The Coder

what tha fack

[HomeMaker]

Re: Weezy The Coder

I only focus on the first 101 letters of the pi code, so the closer to the beginning the better because those are the most important digits.

that quote from the pi code sheet/website i think mike keith is saying that any literature would EVENTUALLY show up in the pi code base 26, but that is so rare because just do 26 times 26 times 26 and on on and on for each letter slot to predict the probability of or odds of what that would come out to and yo would see that it is a large number so u'd have to look at a trillion to the 30th power and like i said i just look at the first 100, and when i am looking at the actual digits not the code letters in base 26 i am only looking at like the first 20-30 digits

when i do anagrams, i generally stick to not to large of a sample of letters so it doesn't get out of hand for you to see whatever it is that you are looking for or to see.

most of the codework on this thread IS USING THE BACKWARDS ALPHABET CODE and in THAT code that i came upon i set/start A as 1 not 0......but seeing as there is a debate whether to start at 0 or 1, i know that it can be either.

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

Re: Weezy The Coder

I only focus on the first 101 letters of the pi code, so the closer to the beginning the better because those are the most important digits.

that quote from the pi code sheet/website i think mike keith is saying that any literature would EVENTUALLY show up in the pi code base 26, but that is so rare because just do 26 times 26 times 26 and on on and on for each letter slot to predict the probability of or odds of what that would come out to and yo would see that it is a large number so u'd have to look at a trillion to the 30th power and like i said i just look at the first 100, and when i am looking at the actual digits not the code letters in base 26 i am only looking at like the first 20-30 digits

when i do anagrams, i generally stick to not to large of a sample of letters so it doesn't get out of hand for you to see whatever it is that you are looking for or to see.

most of the codework on this thread IS USING THE BACKWARDS ALPHABET CODE and in THAT code that i came upon i set/start A as 1 not 0......but seeing as there is a debate whether to start at 0 or 1, i know that it can be either.

No I noticed most of your working out is in backwards alphabet so no need to capitalise it, I'm just saying you keep referencing to Pi so I was pointing something out to you. I can understand it though after about 2 minutes of reading, I couldn't do it but I can follow it if you do it in full. But could you please explain how you can look at Pi at a trillion to the power of 30 when Pi is only known up to 206,158,430,000 digits?? That's only 206 billion no where near to a trillion. Also you haven't decoded my name in full like I asked if you could. If you were able to do this all correctly then it would be no hassle. Call me an annoyence but I'm finding flaws left right and center in all of this...

[HomeMaker]

Re: Weezy The Coder

yeah, true, i think pi is only been calculated to so many digits but i was just giving an example when it comes to the "trillion to the 30th power". that example of what it would take to actually have a certain "text" to appear like the quote says.

you're not finding flaws--u just don't know it first hand and haven't done it firsthand so it looks like i haven't followed the rules

MICHAEL BLISS...i'm not sure what you are looking for me to decode when it comes to your name

can unscramble(off bacwards alphabet code) to "HOUSE COADERS" or "HOUSES COADER"

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

Re: Weezy The Coder

yeah, true, i think pi is only been calculated to so many digits but i was just giving an example when it comes to the "trillion to the 30th power". that example of what it would take to actually have a certain "text" to appear like the quote says.

you're not finding flaws--u just don't know it first hand and haven't done it firsthand so it looks like i haven't followed the rules

MICHAEL BLISS...i'm not sure what you are looking for me to decode when it comes to your name

can unscramble(off bacwards alphabet code) to "HOUSE COADERS" or "HOUSES COADER"

No I'm finding flaws...Like I have said and now I will say again if this was done under proper conditions or used as a thesis for something important you would be told that it's all bullshit and to do it all one way showing every step you took to get there. True I don't know it all first hand and yes this isn't under proper conditions but it counts, if you want someone to believe it you back it up correctly and in one way, or you do it in two ways seperately. Mixing two or three different ways to get the result you want isn't fair testing or discovery, you gotta play by the rules to get the answer you want.

[HomeMaker]

Re: Weezy The Coder

ignorance is bliss!------------lol

[IgnoranceIsBliss]

Re: Weezy The Coder

ignorance is bliss!------------lol

Well if your going to try and make a smart ass remark using my name at least get your grammer correct and UCase my name

Yet me re-iterating my points seem to have finally sunk into your head that you aren't correct and you looked however you wanted for your answers instead of them be found in a fair manner.

[HomeMaker]

Re: Weezy The Coder

song looking at is "forever" from the drought 3 disk 2 track 6 i think.

quote looking at-- "I keep something in the trunk, like an elephant, but you remember it--like a elephant"

"I keep something in TT like an elephant"

elephant is a codeword for keystone, however when you unscramble elephant off of the backwards alphabet code it comes out to be "keastone"--spelled a little differently but can be seen easily. so sub keastone for elephant

"I keep something in TT-- like a keastone"------------------see the very first post of this thread for what the keystone is.

and when he says "but" it sounds like he says "bet".....and i've allready explained how "bet" is related to the "keystone"

"i keep something in the trunk, like an elephant, but you remember it"

above, initialas are underlined. running backwards we have "b-e-a-l-t"...........read between the line(l) and get "beat" which is a way and longer way to pronounce "bet" cuz "bet" is pronounced "bait" or "Bate"

[HomeMaker]

Re: Weezy The Coder

oh, i forgot to say that the above quote that looking at is at roughly 1:20-1:30 in the song

[JC514]

Re: Weezy The Coder

haha