Become a member of the Lil Wayne HQ Forum. Register Today!
Congratulations on finding the biggest and best forum for everything Lil Wayne and Young Money Entertainment.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ, and to join in discussions with other members of this board you will need to register with us. As a registered member, you will gain access to every forum, able to post, create new threads, send and receive private messages, search and plenty more cool features! Register today!
spending the night with someone doesnt equal fuckin...show some pics with his dick in her pussy even then he wont catch a charge cause as people said 16 is the limit...wtf they on about every girl fucks at 13-14
spending the night with someone doesnt equal fuckin...show some pics with his dick in her pussy even then he wont catch a charge cause as people said 16 is the limit...wtf they on about every girl fucks at 13-14
im not interested in it at all but they on some "oh my god HE VIOLATED HIS PAROLE OH MY gODDD" shit so a pic of him standing next to her isnt really proof
im not interested in it at all but they on some "oh my god HE VIOLATED HIS PAROLE OH MY gODDD" shit so a pic of him standing next to her isnt really proof
The "position of trust under 18" anti-exploitation rules were expanded in 2005 by Bill C-2 where a judge may choose to term a situation to be sexual exploitation based on the age of the younger party, age difference, evolution of the relationship (how it developed, e.g.: quickly and secretly over the Internet), the control or influence over the young person (degree of control or influence the other person had over the young person). This passed before the 2008 amendments, and they were not repealed so they are still in effect and can apply towards adults in these situations with young persons over the age of consent and under 18 (16-17).
The "position of trust under 18" anti-exploitation rules were expanded in 2005 by Bill C-2 where a judge may choose to term a situation to be sexual exploitation based on the age of the younger party, age difference, evolution of the relationship (how it developed, e.g.: quickly and secretly over the Internet), the control or influence over the young person (degree of control or influence the other person had over the young person). This passed before the 2008 amendments, and they were not repealed so they are still in effect and can apply towards adults in these situations with young persons over the age of consent and under 18 (16-17).
Nice copy and paste :]
But does that even matter if he's in a different country?
Comment