Originally posted by Mbminas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Damn,
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by KidComet View PostBruh,
The package insert for the vaccines tell you themsleves that they cause autism
go to the official Food and Drug Administration site
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Biologi.../UCM101580.pdf
page 11.
thank you for playing good bye
First, the link you posted is for a pamphlet that's literally a decade old. It's dated 2005, back when the link between autism and vaccines had yet to be ruled out. In the ten years that have followed the link has been ruled out. The single study that supported the idea has been widely debunked and was unable to be replicated. There are numerous studies since that time that have demonstrated this. Taking this out of date information and attempting to use it out of context to make your point is the same as taking propaganda from the 1940s to "prove" that cigarettes don't cause lung cancer.
Second, the link you posted doesn't even mean what you think it does. The link you posted actually specifically states that it is not possible to establish that the vaccine caused autism. You have to actually read the entire paragraph instead of trying to cherry pick out a single word and stopping.
Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to
establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.
Third, this is an informational pamphlet. It was intended to provide as much information as possible, not to determine a cause. It is not a scientific peer reviewed study. It is not proving your case. It is not proving anything. It's a basic summary for why the product was approved by the FDA and any of the possible side effects the product could have. If you wanted to prove your case you would need a scientific study to prove your point, not one line you misunderstood from a ten year old pamphlet. And that's the thing, since that time the studies have been very clear and consistent that vaccines don't cause autism.
Here's a actually up to date study (2013) that demonstrates once again there is no link between autism and vaccines. Unlike your FDA pamphlet, this link is directly to the actual peer reviewed study. It's titled "Increasing Exposure to Antibody-Stimulating Proteins and Polysaccharides in Vaccines Is Not Associated with Risk of Autism" from the Journal of Pediatrics. - http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476%2813%2900144-3/pdf
And here's a lovely link to a trustworthy site WebMD. It has a nice article you (and anyone unfortunate enough to have read your posts) should familiarize yourself with.
"Autism-Vaccine Link: Evidence Doesn't Dispel Doubts" - Autism-Vaccine Link: Evidence Doesn't Dispel Doubts
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine all agree that there's probably no relationship between autism and vaccines.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EatYourSpinach View PostOk, I realize you're probably just trolling. I've read enough of your posts to recognize this. But for the sake of anyone who might actually take what you're saying remotely seriously I feel I should respond. Continuing the widely debunked conspiracy theory is not only factually incorrect, it's quite literally dangerous.
First, the link you posted is for a pamphlet that's literally a decade old. It's dated 2005, back when the link between autism and vaccines had yet to be ruled out. In the ten years that have followed the link has been ruled out. The single study that supported the idea has been widely debunked and was unable to be replicated. There are numerous studies since that time that have demonstrated this. Taking this out of date information and attempting to use it out of context to make your point is the same as taking propaganda from the 1940s to "prove" that cigarettes don't cause lung cancer.
Second, the link you posted doesn't even mean what you think it does. The link you posted actually specifically states that it is not possible to establish that the vaccine caused autism. You have to actually read the entire paragraph instead of trying to cherry pick out a single word and stopping.
This means that someone voluntarily reported that their child was disagnosed with autism after receiving a vaccine, it does not by any stretch mean the vaccine caused the autism. On the contrary, the statement quoted above specifically rules out establishing ANY cause. To put it plainly, back before people knew better someone offered the information of the autism diagnosis. Even back then it was not used to say the vaccine caused autism (causal relationship). At that point people believed the link was possible, so the information was included.
Third, this is an informational pamphlet. It was intended to provide as much information as possible, not to determine a cause. It is not a scientific peer reviewed study. It is not proving your case. It is not proving anything. It's a basic summary for why the product was approved by the FDA and any of the possible side effects the product could have. If you wanted to prove your case you would need a scientific study to prove your point, not one line you misunderstood from a ten year old pamphlet. And that's the thing, since that time the studies have been very clear and consistent that vaccines don't cause autism.
Here's a actually up to date study (2013) that demonstrates once again there is no link between autism and vaccines. Unlike your FDA pamphlet, this link is directly to the actual peer reviewed study. It's titled "Increasing Exposure to Antibody-Stimulating Proteins and Polysaccharides in Vaccines Is Not Associated with Risk of Autism" from the Journal of Pediatrics. - http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476%2813%2900144-3/pdf
And here's a lovely link to a trustworthy site WebMD. It has a nice article you (and anyone unfortunate enough to have read your posts) should familiarize yourself with.
"Autism-Vaccine Link: Evidence Doesn't Dispel Doubts" - Autism-Vaccine Link: Evidence Doesn't Dispel Doubts
And finally. Now that I've appropriately taken you to school for those dangerous comments, I'll remind you that in your original post you suggested you had proof of some crazy murder plot. So far you've provided a link to a pseudo-science website full of bad information promoting dangerous non-FDA approved supplements and a pamphlet. Instead of trying to double down on an already disproven conspiracy theory like vaccines/autism, get on with proving this new conspiracy you promised us all.
You wrote a whole paragraph for nothing. Do more research. Look up Dr Bradstreet. Look up how he died. And look up what the police was looking for on his search warrant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KidComet View PostSo , you're basically denying that nagalese appears after you receive vaccines which then attacks GcMAF cells ? You gotta be the biggest smartest dummy I know man.
You wrote a whole paragraph for nothing. Do more research. Look up Dr Bradstreet. Look up how he died. And look up what the police was looking for on his search warrant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KidComet View PostSo , you're basically denying that nagalese appears after you receive vaccines which then attacks GcMAF cells ? You gotta be the biggest smartest dummy I know man.
You wrote a whole paragraph for nothing. Do more research. Look up Dr Bradstreet. Look up how he died. And look up what the police was looking for on his search warrant.
Pull up KC, you're straight up in too deep.
Look up Dr. Bradstreet yourself and you'll see that his work on linking vaccines and autism was rejected for publication. They found that the findings in the data he tried to publish were incorrect and that "the evidence favors rejection of a relationship between vaccines and autism". He failed the peer-review portion of how science works. Again you can't cherry pick one conspiracy theory nugget and ignore the stacks of data that demonstrate it's false. You can't use a study for scientific credibility if it's been ripped apart by the scientific community. It's just not how science works.
Now that I've set the record straight about the crazy vaccine conspiracy theory... I'm out. Still no proof of your original attention grabbing murder claim. Each post is just another rant about some discredited psuedo-science garbage. I literally took apart your "proof" piece by piece and replaced with the settled and established scientific record. Heck, your last post of "proof" literally contradicted you all on it's own. And then your response just moves on to another conspiracy website you've found, with no acknowledgement of all the faults.
Oh and for the record, I'm not personally denying anything. I'm saying that the science is rather settled, the studies are clear. You're just citing the same old debunked conspiracy theories. I'm providing the peer-reviewed science that others have presented and fact checked... you're providing your own opinions and some shady conspiracy theory websites. Disagree with established science all you like, but don't mistake my pointing out your errors as a denial of anything. It's not my work, it's not my opinion. It's the current established science against your confused ramblings.
Game set match.
This was fun by the way. I see how you earned your reputation. I hope you're just a delightful troll, otherwise I hope you get some medical attention. It's a much nicer world if you're in on the joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EatYourSpinach View PostPull up KC, you're straight up in too deep.
Look up Dr. Bradstreet yourself and you'll see that his work on linking vaccines and autism was rejected for publication. They found that the findings in the data he tried to publish were incorrect and that "the evidence favors rejection of a relationship between vaccines and autism". He failed the peer-review portion of how science works. Again you can't cherry pick one conspiracy theory nugget and ignore the stacks of data that demonstrate it's false. You can't use a study for scientific credibility if it's been ripped apart by the scientific community. It's just not how science works.
Now that I've set the record straight about the crazy vaccine conspiracy theory... I'm out. Still no proof of your original attention grabbing murder claim. Each post is just another rant about some discredited psuedo-science garbage. I literally took apart your "proof" piece by piece and replaced with the settled and established scientific record. Heck, your last post of "proof" literally contradicted you all on it's own. And then your response just moves on to another conspiracy website you've found, with no acknowledgement of all the faults.
Oh and for the record, I'm not personally denying anything. I'm saying that the science is rather settled, the studies are clear. You're just citing the same old debunked conspiracy theories. I'm providing the peer-reviewed science that others have presented and fact checked... you're providing your own opinions and some shady conspiracy theory websites. Disagree with established science all you like, but don't mistake my pointing out your errors as a denial of anything. It's not my work, it's not my opinion. It's the current established science against your confused ramblings.
Game set match.
This was fun by the way. I see how you earned your reputation. I hope you're just a delightful troll, otherwise I hope you get some medical attention. It's a much nicer world if you're in on the joke.
It's proven that that nagalese appears after you receive vaccines which then attacks GcMAF cells. Why was Dr Bradstreet murdered after he got raided by the FDA? Come on bruh. What was on the police s search warrant? GcMAF. These phamricutical companies are in it for the money. They don't care about us getting cured. There is no money in the cure. There is money in the treatment. The love of money is the root of all evil. Don't forget that. You the biggest smartest dummy ever. You need to wake up and understand that 1% of the population owns more then half then 99%. That distribution of wealth should tell you what's up lol. Your too busy on that "omg the government would never hurt us" "the doctors care for us so much they would never mislead us ". When Dr. fata was arrested for administering chemotherapy to patients that didn't need it just so he can get more money. Lol get out of here. If you listen to maiantream bs all your life your brainwashed
- - - Updated - - -
And the proof is in the video I posted. Refute every claim made in that videoLast edited by KidComet; 07-25-2015, 05:20 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KidComet View PostI just told you.
It's proven that that nagalese appears after you receive vaccines which then attacks GcMAF cells. Why was Dr Bradstreet murdered after he got raided by the FDA? Come on bruh. What was on the police s search warrant? GcMAF. These phamricutical companies are in it for the money. They don't care about us getting cured. There is no money in the cure. There is money in the treatment. The love of money is the root of all evil. Don't forget that. You the biggest smartest dummy ever. You need to wake up and understand that 1% of the population owns more then half then 99%. That distribution of wealth should tell you what's up lol. Your too busy on that "omg the government would never hurt us" "the doctors care for us so much they would never mislead us ". When Dr. fata was arrested for administering chemotherapy to patients that didn't need it just so he can get more money. Lol get out of here. If you listen to maiantream bs all your life your brainwashed
- - - Updated - - -
And the proof is in the video I posted. Refute every claim made in that video
But then I took your advice. Sure it was hard to ignore actual data that could be reproduced and instead believe entirely in some random doctor who made claims no one could reproduce without any evidence at all. But, I did it. I ignored the stacks of clear evidence from educated scientists, they were all controlled like puppets by the governments and the 1% that owns more "then half then 99%". Despite the evidence coming from many different countries and even the W.H.O., it's clear that all of these countries are secretly conspiring together to push their brainwashing propaganda. Most likely, you're right, it was the "phamricutical" companies. And mostly, I think it was really from all the "maiantream" bs you mentioned.
My eyes are now open. It took me a while to understand, mostly because of the egregious spelling errors and atrocious grammar (i.e. Your instead of You're, then instead of than). My brain has been clean thanks to you. First with your completely understandable belief that because treatment supposedly generates more money than any cure ever would, well that doesn't need any evidence or proof to be true. Sure, it still took me a minute, because I knew of all the diseases that already have been cured. But then I realized that that's exactly what the MAN wanted me to think. Those diseases weren't even real, they created them in the lab and then cured them just to generate my belief that "the government would never hurt us". And then you made such a good link between those "phamricutical" companies and a complicated economic system that unfairly generates more income to a tiny fraction of the population. Sure, I mean, it doesn't actually make logical sense but then you connected these two abstract thoughts and forced them to corroborate your narrative.
All of this clearly demonstrates the link between vaccines and autism.
And now that I know you ignore evidence based scientific peer review and instead rely on shady people writing unsubstantiated claims on websites without any oversight I've learned quite a bit more as well.
And 9/11 was clearly an inside job. Seriously, there's even a video on YouTube.
And the moon landing? Didn't happen. There's no such thing as space, everything just ends immediately outside of our planet.
And there isn't actually anything outside of America. It's all been created by the government to scare us into more military spending. The Spanish language is real, but everything else... fiction!
Jesus wasn't white, or black, or middle eastern. He was actually an alien (not from space, of course) from another dimension. But he never actually made himself visible to any people. The Bible was created by the Illuminati under the direct supervision of Jay-Z.
Jay-Z? He doens't age. I'm still learning about this one, but it's something to do with the Illuminati. He's been there since the dawn of time and he's the one who created the 99% vs 1% battle you speak of! It all comes together!
Comment
-
jay z doesnt age? yes he does lol [MENTION=95035]EatYourSpinach[/MENTION] when you black and have money you can do plenty of things to your face to make you look the same as you did at 20. look at pharrell. white people cant
Comment
-
Originally posted by EatYourSpinach View PostMan you got me. You're right, I've spent too much time being brainwashed by the scientific community. Using evidence based peer reviewed studies to inform me has left me really confused. Like sure it made me smart, but also it made me a dummy. And the more facts and evidence I had it just made me bigger too. I just ended up being the biggest smartest dummy EVER! It was insane.
But then I took your advice. Sure it was hard to ignore actual data that could be reproduced and instead believe entirely in some random doctor who made claims no one could reproduce without any evidence at all. But, I did it. I ignored the stacks of clear evidence from educated scientists, they were all controlled like puppets by the governments and the 1% that owns more "then half then 99%". Despite the evidence coming from many different countries and even the W.H.O., it's clear that all of these countries are secretly conspiring together to push their brainwashing propaganda. Most likely, you're right, it was the "phamricutical" companies. And mostly, I think it was really from all the "maiantream" bs you mentioned.
My eyes are now open. It took me a while to understand, mostly because of the egregious spelling errors and atrocious grammar (i.e. Your instead of You're, then instead of than). My brain has been clean thanks to you. First with your completely understandable belief that because treatment supposedly generates more money than any cure ever would, well that doesn't need any evidence or proof to be true. Sure, it still took me a minute, because I knew of all the diseases that already have been cured. But then I realized that that's exactly what the MAN wanted me to think. Those diseases weren't even real, they created them in the lab and then cured them just to generate my belief that "the government would never hurt us". And then you made such a good link between those "phamricutical" companies and a complicated economic system that unfairly generates more income to a tiny fraction of the population. Sure, I mean, it doesn't actually make logical sense but then you connected these two abstract thoughts and forced them to corroborate your narrative.
All of this clearly demonstrates the link between vaccines and autism.
And now that I know you ignore evidence based scientific peer review and instead rely on shady people writing unsubstantiated claims on websites without any oversight I've learned quite a bit more as well.
And 9/11 was clearly an inside job. Seriously, there's even a video on YouTube.
And the moon landing? Didn't happen. There's no such thing as space, everything just ends immediately outside of our planet.
And there isn't actually anything outside of America. It's all been created by the government to scare us into more military spending. The Spanish language is real, but everything else... fiction!
Jesus wasn't white, or black, or middle eastern. He was actually an alien (not from space, of course) from another dimension. But he never actually made himself visible to any people. The Bible was created by the Illuminati under the direct supervision of Jay-Z.
Jay-Z? He doens't age. I'm still learning about this one, but it's something to do with the Illuminati. He's been there since the dawn of time and he's the one who created the 99% vs 1% battle you speak of! It all comes together!
There is a huge cover up going on. I'll leave it at that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KidComet View PostNagalese is in vaccines which then attack GcMAF cells.
There is a huge cover up going on. I'll leave it at that.
But brah, I got to warn you. I was doing research on that Bradstreet guy, right? Well watch out. First warning flag... HE WENT TO the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA! That's the fourth largest public university in Florida. PUBLIC UNIVERSITY BRAH! He was educated by the government!!! THE GOVERNMENT! Remember the government? We can't trust them. It's all just propaganda.
And it's not just that. He went to that government brainwashing camp... and guess what he did then? He got a medical degree. That's right, he's a DOCTOR! Doctors are one of the richest occupations in the country! Not only is he a government propagandist, he's also part of the rich 1% conspiring to with the government. And plus, like you said man, doctors don't want to heal you... there's no money in cures. He was trying to make you sick, to make more money, to control more government, to spread more of the lies and keep this corrupt system running!
He's been the enemy this whole time! I can't believe... all of your warnings. Government, rich and a health care system designed to profit on sickness. He's the root of it all!!!
---
Brief flash of sanity
You do realize that "Dr. Bradstreet" died from what appears to be a self inflicted gun shot wound shortly after finding out his dangerous miracle cure killed five children in Switzerland. The GcMAF drugs he was pumping into these children had not undergone any safety testing, is not approved by the FDA and experts say there is absolutely no evidence to suggest it would have any effect on autism.
http://http://www.forbes.com/sites/e...or-bradstreet/
And of course I would be remiss if I didn't again point out that five studies of over 1.3 million children found that vaccines absolutely are NOT connected to autism. Full stop.
Vaccines, Thimerosal, MMR, Mercury Not Associated With Autism - Forbes
---
Back into KidComet world
PHEW! That was a close one there. Almost went back to believing in actual evidence. It's not like it's remotely possible that this man, who couldn't get any legitimate scientist to replicate or publish his works went ahead with his insane GcMAF delusions and killed five children in his disgusting experiments before taking his own life. That's just crazy! That would mean the drug he was trying to sell ended up actually being super dangerous and he actually cared more about marketing some insane miracle cure than human life. But there's way too much actual information, science and evidence backing that up for it to be the case. It's so obviously planted. Yup, that's it. It's way way WAY more likely that it's that big convoluted government conspiracy led by the wealthy that have co-opted all the scientists world wide to only publish their data and cover up everything. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally posted by Lucifer View Postjay z doesnt age? yes he does lol @EatYourSpinach when you black and have money you can do plenty of things to your face to make you look the same as you did at 20. look at pharrell. white people cant
Jay-Z, Time Traveler? Man In Vintage Photo Bears Resemblance To Rapper
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3252911.html
Comment
Comment