Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CDQ NoDJ: Difference

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CDQ NoDJ: Difference

    I been wonderin about that for a while. How is CDQ cd quality anyway? all those tracks that claim to be cdq that are like 192 kbps arent CDQ anyway. CDs have more than 1000 kbps so wtf?? all those uploaders use cdq / no dj when they mean the same: a tagless version of a song that is not necessarily good quality.


    FUCK WiT DUNSTON, iMMA PUT MY FOOT iN YO ASS

  • #2
    basically everything > 128kbps gets labeled as "CDQ" in the blog world
    THIS AIN'T NOTHING TO RELATE TO.


    last.fm || twitter

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by IceMan View Post
      basically everything > 128kbps gets labeled as "CDQ" in the blog world
      dumbass retards then


      FUCK WiT DUNSTON, iMMA PUT MY FOOT iN YO ASS

      Comment


      • #4
        It also has to do with if the song is properly mixed/mastered as well. If a song isn't mixed/mastered properly and saved as 256KBPS for example, it could still sound bad. The bass wouldn't sound right and the vocals could sound static-y. But if the song is mixed/mastered properly, and saved at 192 KBPS it should sound great. Obviously when you start saving it at higher KBPS it will sound better to those with an ear for music and good speakers/headphones, but most can't tell the difference.



        protect dunston at all costs

        Comment


        • #5
          The short answer is: 192KBPS & prober mastered = CDQ

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ABjerg View Post
            The short answer is: 192KBPS & prober mastered = CDQ
            nah. many use the term cdq wrong then.

            ty THP


            FUCK WiT DUNSTON, iMMA PUT MY FOOT iN YO ASS

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Quil View Post
              nah. many use the term cdq wrong then.

              ty THP
              Even though ABjerg was trying to take my info and sound smart, he was actually right.


              192 is considered CDQ.




              protect dunston at all costs

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PrettyFlacko. View Post
                Even though ABjerg was trying to take my info and sound smart, he was actually right.


                192 is considered CDQ.

                Yeah I know he is right, I just meant that many blogs/news sites have used the term wrong because they posted 160 kbps files and added a CDQ tag


                FUCK WiT DUNSTON, iMMA PUT MY FOOT iN YO ASS

                Comment


                • #9
                  Good post. So then in terms of quality, which is better: iTunes 256 or 320 kbps CD rip? Cause I've replaced alot of my songs with iTunes quality, and the sound quality can't be beat, well atleast to me. Maybe I need better in ear headphones to enjoy sound even more.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by breezy214 View Post
                    Good post. So then in terms of quality, which is better: iTunes 256 or 320 kbps CD rip? Cause I've replaced alot of my songs with iTunes quality, and the sound quality can't be beat, well atleast to me. Maybe I need better in ear headphones to enjoy sound even more.
                    the only difference is the file size.

                    I ain't got Dunston on my shoulder, got Dunston in the backseat

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by breezy214 View Post
                      Good post. So then in terms of quality, which is better: iTunes 256 or 320 kbps CD rip? Cause I've replaced alot of my songs with iTunes quality, and the sound quality can't be beat, well atleast to me. Maybe I need better in ear headphones to enjoy sound even more.
                      320>256
                      THIS AIN'T NOTHING TO RELATE TO.


                      last.fm || twitter

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by IceMan View Post
                        320>256
                        iTunes 256 kbps is almost equal to 320 kbps mp3.
                        no, even I can't hear the difference


                        FUCK WiT DUNSTON, iMMA PUT MY FOOT iN YO ASS

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X