Something for Athiest and Evoluitionist to take into consideration

[mode]

@KidComet

Scientists Detect Direct Evidence of Big Bang?s Gravitational Waves | I Fucking Love Science

what do you think of this?

Physicist rejoices as he learns his Big Bang theory is correct


awesome video, of them telling the guy who predicted it. crazy stuff.

[KidComet]

@KidComet

Scientists Detect Direct Evidence of Big Bang?s Gravitational Waves | I Fucking Love Science

what do you think of this?

When I saw that I thought of KidComet

Physicist rejoices as he learns his Big Bang theory is correct


awesome video, of them telling the guy who predicted it. crazy stuff.

My bad I didn't know I faced any opposition in this thread, I wouldve responded sooner, I thought everyone was just trollin my thread up as usual.


Anyways, check it out guys.

*Before I start, the fact that Seal thinks about me away from this forum is pretty cool"


Okay to begin,

The Big Bang theory? It's interesting that staggering numbers of the most prominent scientific minds on earth adopt a theory,despite the elementary principal & fact,that an explosion has never created,ordered or arranged anything,in the history of humankind!



Another point to mention,

There is danger when scientists hold their faith in human logic above faith in our Creator. These persons are no different from anyone devoted to a religion; they have chosen faith in man and will find facts to defend that faith.





Let me re illiterate the fact that the universe, as intricate as it is, being made randomoly, is illogical. There are flaws in both evolution and the Big Bang theory. Both can be dis-proven, none of those disproofs will be televised or make the news.

Also note, a lot of people think that God and science never agree with each other, those people are wrong.Christians are free to respect science, but we know who our creator is. People don't physically feel God, and that is what is sometimes needed for belief just knowing that God is there. The feeling is undeniably God.

Anyways, as for this bit of new pro found info that these scientist "believe", noticed I put quotations around it, hint hint,

they say that these gravitational waves started after the big bang, but they still can't explain what caused it. The evidence still doesn't disprove a creator in anyway. If you choose to put your faith in scientist in white robes looking into microscopes, then thats you. Science doesnt disprove the bible. There are facts that the earth has been around for less then 10k years, that science tries to disprove, but fails to do so, and even when there is a fact that knocks that belief out, another scientific facts knocks that one right back.

It seems to me as if there is every excuse not to think that a God created us. The discovery, is but a mere speedbumb, the truth will always suffice in the end.

[Bill Laimbeer]

@KidComet , could you possibly render that the universe follows a wave pattern, expanding and collapsing, with no end and no beginning?

Oh and btw, I actually read one of your posts for the first time in a while.

[KidComet]

@KidComet , could you possibly render that the universe follows a wave pattern, expanding and collapsing, with no end and no beginning?

Oh and btw, I actually read one of your posts for the first time in a while.

Doesn't seem logical to me, even if the universe had no end and no beginning, it still doesn't explain all these perfect sizes and distances of planets and the moon and the sun from the earth and so on. Unless you want to say someowhere in the collapsing and expanding, all these perfect calcusiton just happened and we got lucky that this planet was perfect for human form, but the chances of that, is outstanding, almost impossible and also It still doesnt explain the origin of Consciousness or natural law

[Bill Laimbeer]

Doesn't seem logical to me, even if the universe had no end and no beginning, it still doesn't explain all these perfect sizes and distances of planets and the moon and the sun from the earth and so on. Unless you want to say someowhere in the collapsing and expanding, all these perfect calcusiton just happened and we got lucky that this planet was perfect for human form, but the chances of that, is outstanding, almost impossible and also It still doesnt explain the origin of Consciousness or natural law

There are trillions of galaxies in this universe with billions of starts, with several planets and several moons. The probability of sustainable life is extremely possible. Think about how many trillions upon trillions of planets there are in the universe. Even if the probability of life on a planet is 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 (whatever it actually is, IDK),it depends on the statistics behind nuclear fusion within each solar system within each galazy. Multiply that number by all of the planets in the known universe, and you would have 1000's of planets that can and probably do sustain life.

Our solar system is lucky, but there are billions of stars collapsing right now in the universe, destroying any planet and any life form upon it.

Natural law and the process of thought comes with natural selection. Law proceeds with time. When life first started on this earth, I don't believe there was such a thing as communication or conscience . Everything progressed with whatever allowed our species to survive within the bare world. When we first started out, it would be better for groups of humans to stay together to fend off predators because we are not strong physically as a species. It would also prove beneficial for trade and communication for humans to survive.

The one thing I think you should look up is chaos theory. I don't really care if you look into much of the other stuff I wrote. But chaos theory is the one thing I think you should look up. It basically says that all things that are calm, will eventually disintegrate into chaos and everything that is in chaos, will form into a calm state. It is how I look upon the universe.

[nickiminajsitonmyface]

There is no answer and debating this is dumb. You will never know. Some questions are just questions.

[KidComet]

There are trillions of galaxies in this universe with billions of starts, with several planets and several moons. The probability of sustainable life is extremely possible. Think about how many trillions upon trillions of planets there are in the universe. Even if the probability of life on a planet is 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 (whatever it actually is, IDK),it depends on the statistics behind nuclear fusion within each solar system within each galazy. Multiply that number by all of the planets in the known universe, and you would have 1000's of planets that can and probably do sustain life.

Our solar system is lucky, but there are billions of stars collapsing right now in the universe, destroying any planet and any life form upon it.

Natural law and the process of thought comes with natural selection. Law proceeds with time. When life first started on this earth, I don't believe there was such a thing as communication or conscience . Everything progressed with whatever allowed our species to survive within the bare world. When we first started out, it would be better for groups of humans to stay together to fend off predators because we are not strong physically as a species. It would also prove beneficial for trade and communication for humans to survive.

The one thing I think you should look up is chaos theory. I don't really care if you look into much of the other stuff I wrote. But chaos theory is the one thing I think you should look up. It basically says that all things that are calm, will eventually disintegrate into chaos and everything that is in chaos, will form into a calm state. It is how I look upon the universe.

But is their evidence that human life can be sustainable on any other planet
And as for Natural Law, actually there has been no proof of its origin, only speculations, same with consciousness

[__cas__]

[MENTION=60086]KidComet[/MENTION] , when you take into consideration the sheer vastness of the universe, it is statistically probable that this specific solar system formation could come about by chance. Just something to think about.

[Bill Laimbeer]

But is their evidence that human life can be sustainable on any other planet
And as for Natural Law, actually there has been no proof of its origin, only speculations, same with consciousness

Life is sustainable on any planet if there is the correct concentration of certain elements. All of the science is their to prove it, we just need the technology to observe such life on other planets, which we should be able to produce in the near future.

Let me show you something

It shows the assembly of certain structures under uncontrollable energy. Now envision Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen being created by nuclear fission from starts. All of that matter that is formed will eventually collide with each other and create life forms from the reactions related with the collisions and exposure to other elements. If you took science in high school (I'm assuming that you took this), then you would know that living organisms are entirely compromised of these elements. These elements form proteins, which form life as we know it.

All of these elements exist in other solar systems and are formed the exacts same way. They undergo the same probability, which in terms of the trillions of solar systems in the universe, a collision that would form proteins and ultimately form life is 100% possible.

[KidComet]

@KidComet , when you take into consideration the sheer vastness of the universe, it is statistically probable that this specific solar system formation could come about by chance. Just something to think about.

But it still doesnt rule out a chance of a creator

if anything it backs it up,

- - - Updated - - -

Life is sustainable on any planet if there is the correct concentration of certain elements. All of the science is their to prove it, we just need the technology to observe such life on other planets, which we should be able to produce in the near future.

Let me show you something

It shows the assembly of certain structures under uncontrollable energy. Now envision Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen being created by nuclear fission from starts. All of that matter that is formed will eventually collide with each other and create life forms from the reactions related with the collisions and exposure to other elements. If you took science in high school (I'm assuming that you took this), then you would know that living organisms are entirely compromised of these elements. These elements form proteins, which form life as we know it.

All of these elements exist in other solar systems and are formed the exacts same way. They undergo the same probability, which in terms of the trillions of solar systems in the universe, a collision that would form proteins and ultimately form life is 100% possible.

We can go on and on, your telling me you need Point A, and Point B to get to Point C, but there is never any knowledge of what created Point A, if I can put it in those terms.

[__cas__]

We can go on and on, your telling me you need Point A, and Point B to get to Point C, but there is never any knowledge of what created Point A, if I can put it in those terms.

I agree with this. You get to a point where there has to have been something to set everything in motion. Whether it be natural or supernatural can never be proven.

[Bill Laimbeer]

But it still doesnt rule out a chance of a creator

if anything it backs it up,

- - - Updated - - -



We can go on and on, your telling me you need Point A, and Point B to get to Point C, but there is never any knowledge of what created Point A, if I can put it in those terms.

Chaos theory states that point A, B, and C existed and also never existed. The universe would expand and condense over time as a sinusoidal curve, never ending, with no beginning.